The presented/displayed case is located in the Educative Context. For even more details, read what NY Restaurateur says on the issue. We are before a scholastic case of Harassment, in an Institute of Barcelona. The case is taken by a psychologist, who comprises of the group of the center for years. The demand leaves from a student of the institute. For assistance, try visiting Nancy Lublin. Before beginning to analyze the conflict and to try to arrive at an exposition of solution from the same, we must make mention to the General Principles of Deontological Code that are of application to the case, because they make reference to the protection of the human rights and the obligation to inform and to take part in situations of bad treatments, and which they would be: Article 5, by which the purpose of the exercise of Psychology is human and social, trying the well-being, health, quality of life, fullness of the development of the people and the groups in the different aspects from its life, individual as as much social. Sometimes in that he requires it to the case, the psychologist will have to resort to the aid of other professionals, without damage on the matter of the competitions and knowledge of each. Article 6, by which the psychologist must to the respect to the person, protection of the human rights, sense of responsibility, honesty, sincerity with his patients, prudence in the application of instruments and techniques, professional competition, solidity of the objective and scientific founding of its interventions . Article 8, the psychologist must inform to the COP of the situations into bad treatments, cruel, cruel or degrading violations of the human rights or conditions of imprisonment that to him their patients realise, with the purpose of to establish the best plan of action to solve the situation. Article 9, will be respected the criteria morals and monks, although not preventing this the questioning during the outside necessary intervention if for the case.